Whole genome sequencing is worth it for a small set of people and a small set of findings: inherited cancer syndromes, familial hypercholesterolemia, hemochromatosis, and drug-metabolism variants that change prescribing. Most of the report is probability scores that should never drive a medical decision alone. Fishtown Medicine helps patients decide whether to sequence, and folds the results into care with genetic counseling when a finding is serious.
TL;DR: A consumer whole genome test reads all of your DNA for a few hundred dollars. For most people it changes little, because common diseases come mostly from how you live rather than from one gene. For a few people it changes everything: genes like BRCA (breast and ovarian cancer), Lynch syndrome (colon cancer), familial hypercholesterolemia (very high cholesterol from birth), and hemochromatosis (iron overload) are rare but treatable when found early. Before you buy, write down your family health history. It is free, and it is still the best genetic test there is. If you sequence, have a doctor confirm any serious finding in a clinical lab before acting on it.
The kits have become impressively cheap. A cheek swab in the mail, and a few weeks later you hold a report scoring your genetic risk for hundreds of conditions, from heart disease to how you metabolize coffee. If you are the kind of person who wants to see problems coming, and most of my patients are, the appeal is obvious: this is the one dataset about you that will never change.
Genetics is the G in GER·O·SPAN, the framework I use for healthspan medicine, so I take this territory seriously. The honest answer about consumer sequencing is that the report contains 2 very different products stapled together, and knowing which is which decides whether the purchase was worth it.
What can a genome report change about your medical care?
The first product is the small set of findings medicine calls actionable, and for these the test earns its keep. They are single-gene variants where the risk is large, the science is settled, and a plan exists:
- Hereditary cancer syndromes. BRCA1 and BRCA2 raise lifetime breast and ovarian cancer risk several-fold; Lynch syndrome does the same for colon and uterine cancer. A confirmed finding moves screening up by decades and opens options from MRI surveillance to preventive surgery.
- Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). About 1 in 250 people carries a variant that keeps LDL cholesterol very high from birth. Most never know, and the first symptom is too often a heart attack in someone's 40s. Found early, FH is very treatable.
- Hereditary hemochromatosis. Iron overload that damages the liver, heart, and joints for decades without announcing itself, and one of the most satisfying diagnoses in medicine because the treatment is simply removing blood on a schedule.
- Pharmacogenomics (PGx). Variants in drug-metabolism genes change how you respond to specific antidepressants, blood thinners like clopidogrel, and statins. When I know them, some prescriptions start at a different dose or skip a drug that was going to fail.
Findings on this list deserve 2 things: confirmation in a clinical-grade laboratory before any decision, and a session with a genetic counselor, which I arrange for patients whenever a report crosses that line.
What do the risk scores in the report mean?
The second product is the long tail of the report: polygenic risk scores. For common conditions like heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and depression, thousands of genetic variants each nudge risk a tiny amount, and the score sums the nudges into a percentile.
The fair way to read a polygenic score is as a weather forecast. A high score for heart disease means the odds tilt against you somewhat, the way "70% chance of rain" means bring a jacket. It is not a diagnosis, and a reassuring score is not a pass. Most of these scores also predict less well for people of non-European ancestry, because of who the underlying studies enrolled, a limitation the sleek dashboards rarely mention.
Here is the part I most want you to have. For the common diseases, the levers that decide your outcome are overwhelmingly the ones you can measure and move: ApoB, blood pressure, fasting insulin, fitness, sleep, smoking. A high polygenic score for heart disease changes how early and how hard we work those levers. It does not change what the levers are. Your ApoB matters more than your percentile, and unlike your genome, it responds to treatment.
One blood test bridges the 2 worlds and deserves a special mention: Lp(a), a cholesterol particle set mostly by your genes. It is a $30 blood test you check once in your life, and 1 in 5 people carry a level that meaningfully raises cardiovascular risk. If genetic risk interests you enough to consider sequencing, make sure this simpler test is not the one you skip.
What should you do before buying a genome test?
Write down your family health history first. Who had cancer and at what age, heart attacks before 60, diabetes, and anyone who died young of anything. That history is free, and it remains the most powerful genetic instrument in medicine: it captures the combined effect of your variants plus the environment your family shares, which no sequencer can. It also tells us whether targeted clinical testing, often covered by insurance when criteria are met, makes more sense than a consumer product.
Longevity Medicine
A personalized longevity strategy starts with knowing your real baselines.
A few practical realities belong in the decision too. In the United States, the law known as GINA protects you from health-insurance and employment discrimination based on genetic results, but it does not cover life, disability, or long-term care insurance, which is worth understanding before data exists. Beyond privacy, the sharpest risk of consumer sequencing is emotional: a report that names a variant of uncertain significance can cost months of dread over something that changes nothing. The counterweight to both is simple and the same: never act on a consumer result, in either direction, without clinical confirmation and a person across the table.
At Fishtown Medicine the genome conversation runs in both directions. Some patients arrive with a report, and we confirm what is serious, retire what is noise, and wire the useful parts, PGx above all, into their ongoing care. Others ask whether to sequence at all, and sometimes the family history makes the answer a clinical test instead, or a simple "your money does more good in a DEXA scan and a year of strength coaching." Both answers are medicine.
Actionable Steps Before You Sequence
Get the high-yield genetics for the lowest cost, in order.
- Build the family tree. 3 generations, ages at diagnosis, ages and causes of death where known. 30 minutes with a parent on the phone outperforms most of the report.
- Check Lp(a) once. A standard blood draw, often insurance-covered, that captures one of the most consequential inherited risks directly.
- Decide what you would do with a bad answer. If a BRCA or Lynch finding would not change your screening or choices, sequencing can wait. If it would, test with support around you.
- Route serious findings through confirmation. Clinical-grade re-test plus genetic counseling before any medical decision. Tell Dr. Ash what's going on and bring the report; the plan starts from there.
Key Takeaways
- Whole genome sequencing delivers 2 different products: a short list of actionable single-gene findings, and a long tail of probability scores that should not drive decisions alone.
- BRCA, Lynch syndrome, familial hypercholesterolemia, hemochromatosis, and pharmacogenomic variants are the findings that reliably change care, and they affect a few percent of people.
- Family history remains the highest-yield genetic test, and it costs nothing. Lp(a), checked once, captures a major inherited cardiovascular risk directly.
- Serious consumer findings need clinical-lab confirmation and genetic counseling before any medical decision.
- Fishtown Medicine folds genetics into whole-person care: deciding whether to test, confirming what matters, and putting PGx to work in your prescriptions.
Related at Fishtown Medicine
- GER·O·SPAN - where genetics fits in the healthspan framework.
- Lp(a): The Inherited Risk Factor - the once-in-a-lifetime blood test.
- Longevity Medicine in Philadelphia - the practice built around prevention.
- The MTHFR Clinical Guide - a case study in separating genetic signal from noise.
- At-Home Lab Testing Memberships - the same decision framework for biomarker panels.
Scientific References
- Khera AV, Chaffin M, Aragam KG, et al. Genome-wide polygenic scores for common diseases identify individuals with risk equivalent to monogenic mutations. Nature Genetics. 2018;50(9):1219-1224.
- Nordestgaard BG, Chapman MJ, Humphries SE, et al. Familial hypercholesterolaemia is underdiagnosed and undertreated in the general population. European Heart Journal. 2013;34(45):3478-3490.
- Miller DT, Lee K, Abul-Husn NS, et al. ACMG SF v3.2 list for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genetics in Medicine. 2023;25(8):100866.
- Tsimikas S. A Test in Context: Lipoprotein(a). Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2017;69(6):692-711.
- Martin AR, Kanai M, Kamatani Y, et al. Clinical use of current polygenic risk scores may exacerbate health disparities. Nature Genetics. 2019;51(4):584-591.
Frequently Asked Questions
Common Questions
Deep-Dive Questions
Ready when you are
The chat is our AI assistant, answering from our published guides. To talk it through with Dr. Ash himself, schedule the free 20-minute call.




